Rules of argumentation for the utilization in persuasive essays

If you wish to compose a good persuasive essay, you should employ enough arguments and make use of them precisely. Arguments must persuade the reader and make him change their brain or point of view.

Which are the simplest rules of providing arguments?

  1. 1. Operate with simple, clear, precise and convincing ideas, as persuasiveness can be easily “drowned” in a sea of words and arguments, particularly than he wants to show if they are unclear and inaccurate; the interlocutor “hears” or understands much less.
  2. 2. The manner and rate of this argument should correspond to your temperament of this author:
  • arguments and evidence, explained independently, are a lot more efficient in reaching the objective than if they’re presented all at one time;
  • three to four bright arguments achieve a better effect than numerous meaningless arguments;
  • argumentation ought not to be declarative or seem like a monologue associated with the “protagonist”;
  • appropriate pauses often exert a better influence compared to flow of words;
  • the interlocutor is better influenced by the construction that is active of phrase compared to the passive in terms of proof (for instance, it is far better to say “we are going to get it done” than “can be achieved).
  1. 3. The thinking ought to be correct according to the reader. This means:
  • always openly admit rightness associated with opposite viewpoint when it is right, even when it may have unfavorable effects for you personally. This provides your interlocutor the chance to expect exactly the same behavior from the opposing side. In addition, in that way, you may not break the ethics;
  • it is far better to try only using those arguments which is accepted because of the audience. Try to read him mind beforehand and speak the exact same language;
  • avoid phrases that are empty they indicate a weakening of attention and induce unnecessary pauses to be able to gain some time get the lost thread regarding the discussion (as an example, “as ended up being said,” or “in other words,” “more or less,” “along with all the marked”, “It can be done therefore, and so”, “it was not said”, etc.).

When offering arguments, do the following

It is important to adapt arguments towards the individual associated with reader, ie:

  • build arguments in line with the objectives and motives associated with the interlocutor;
  • keep in mind that “excessive” persuasiveness provokes rebuff from the subordinate, specially if he has got an “aggressive” nature (the “boomerang” effect);
  • avoid expressions that are nondeval formulations which make it hard to argue and comprehend;
  • you will need to present towards the employee whenever possible the data, some ideas and considerations.

Keep in mind the proverb: “It is far better to see as soon as than hear one hundred times.” Bringing comparisons that are vivid visual arguments, you will need to understand that evaluations should always be in line with the connection with your reader, otherwise there will be no result, they have to support and strengthen the author’s argumentation, be convincing, but without exaggeration and extremes that can cause the mistrust for the performer and thereby spot under question all of the parallels. & Most importantly, you have to respect your reader and start to become truthful with him.